<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evil Overlords, Now with Attributes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.treasuretables.org/2007/02/evil-overlords-now-with-attributes/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.treasuretables.org/2007/02/evil-overlords-now-with-attributes</link>
	<description>Game mastering advice, ideas &#038; resources &#8226; Dedicated to helping GMs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 17:04:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.treasuretables.org/2007/02/evil-overlords-now-with-attributes/comment-page-1#comment-9542</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 04:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.treasuretables.org/?p=632#comment-9542</guid>
		<description>Good point about the scheming -- I can see how having a couple of weeks would make a difference.

For the game I&#039;m an EO in right now, we usually get a week or two. That seems to be a good timeframe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point about the scheming &#8212; I can see how having a couple of weeks would make a difference.</p>
<p>For the game I&#8217;m an EO in right now, we usually get a week or two. That seems to be a good timeframe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.treasuretables.org/2007/02/evil-overlords-now-with-attributes/comment-page-1#comment-9477</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 18:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.treasuretables.org/?p=632#comment-9477</guid>
		<description>Supposedly, it is current. The license with SJG expired, and Flying Buffalo (FBI) were not running it for a few years, until they were able to renegotiate the license. Yes, I said a few years. I suspect SJG was mulling an attempt at their own online Illuminati game, but SJG has had a long run of bad luck with licensing their properties for computer play. So they probably tried and failed, after which they returned to the table with FBI.

FBI appears to be moving more and more toward email for turn input, but thay do still offer snail mail games -- when a turn cycle is two weeks long, you can afford to wait for the mail. All of their games are computer moderated, so the move to email turn processing only helps them, but the PBM industry was built on people in out-of-the-way places that do not have other gamers around to play games with, and may not have (reliable) internet access either.

The advantage of a two week turn cycle in Illuminati is that you have that time to plot and scheme, either alone or in communication with other players. Alliances are important, even if they are only temporary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Supposedly, it is current. The license with SJG expired, and Flying Buffalo (FBI) were not running it for a few years, until they were able to renegotiate the license. Yes, I said a few years. I suspect SJG was mulling an attempt at their own online Illuminati game, but SJG has had a long run of bad luck with licensing their properties for computer play. So they probably tried and failed, after which they returned to the table with FBI.</p>
<p>FBI appears to be moving more and more toward email for turn input, but thay do still offer snail mail games &#8212; when a turn cycle is two weeks long, you can afford to wait for the mail. All of their games are computer moderated, so the move to email turn processing only helps them, but the PBM industry was built on people in out-of-the-way places that do not have other gamers around to play games with, and may not have (reliable) internet access either.</p>
<p>The advantage of a two week turn cycle in Illuminati is that you have that time to plot and scheme, either alone or in communication with other players. Alliances are important, even if they are only temporary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.treasuretables.org/2007/02/evil-overlords-now-with-attributes/comment-page-1#comment-9471</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 15:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.treasuretables.org/?p=632#comment-9471</guid>
		<description>Interesting. Thanks for sharing that -- I hadn&#039;t heard of Flying Buffalo&#039;s PbM Illuminati game.

Is it current? I&#039;m surprised anyone still runs snail mail games -- it seems so much more clunky than using email, blogs or forums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. Thanks for sharing that &#8212; I hadn&#8217;t heard of Flying Buffalo&#8217;s PbM Illuminati game.</p>
<p>Is it current? I&#8217;m surprised anyone still runs snail mail games &#8212; it seems so much more clunky than using email, blogs or forums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.treasuretables.org/2007/02/evil-overlords-now-with-attributes/comment-page-1#comment-9467</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 08:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.treasuretables.org/?p=632#comment-9467</guid>
		<description>Flying Buffalo, Inc. runs the official Illuminati Play-by-Mail game (http://www.flyingbuffalo.com/illumin.htm). It is not so narrative as the Evil Overlords concept you described and others expanded, but each group has a number of attributes that affect play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flying Buffalo, Inc. runs the official Illuminati Play-by-Mail game (<a href="http://www.flyingbuffalo.com/illumin.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.flyingbuffalo.com/illumin.htm</a>). It is not so narrative as the Evil Overlords concept you described and others expanded, but each group has a number of attributes that affect play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.treasuretables.org/2007/02/evil-overlords-now-with-attributes/comment-page-1#comment-9456</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.treasuretables.org/?p=632#comment-9456</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m familiar with &lt;i&gt;GURPS Illuminati&lt;/i&gt; -- do you just mean playing that over email, or is there a specific Illuminati PBEM?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m familiar with <i>GURPS Illuminati</i> &#8212; do you just mean playing that over email, or is there a specific Illuminati PBEM?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.treasuretables.org/2007/02/evil-overlords-now-with-attributes/comment-page-1#comment-9447</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 04:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.treasuretables.org/?p=632#comment-9447</guid>
		<description>The Evil Overlords level of the game is starting to sound more and more like the PBEM version of Illuminati.

Note that I do not think that to be a bad thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Evil Overlords level of the game is starting to sound more and more like the PBEM version of Illuminati.</p>
<p>Note that I do not think that to be a bad thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

